US and EU diplomats are holding urgent discussions around the Middle East in a race to try to head off the threat of a full-blown regional war after Israel targeted Hizbollah and Hamas leaders in Beirut and Tehran. e
The western diplomatic pressure comes as fears over a broader regional conflict soared as Iran and Hizbollah separately vowed to avenge the attacks.
Officials said the talks were focused on convincing Tehran to either not respond or to carry out symbolic action, after Israeli diplomats told western interlocutors that their military did not plan further operations.
“Everyone since last night is putting pressure on Tehran to not respond and to contain this,” said one western diplomat involved in the discussions.
“Washington’s ability to shape events is likely to be rather limited,” said Jonathan Panikoff, a former senior intelligence officer who is now director of the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative. “In the immediate term, Iran, Hizbollah, and Hamas’s responses to Shukr and Haniyeh’s deaths will drive the likelihood for a regionalised war or reversion to tit-for-tat attacks,” he added. Event details and information
@ISIDEWITH10mos10MO
How do you feel about using assassinations as a tool for preventing larger conflicts, and what are the moral implications?
@ISIDEWITH10mos10MO
If diplomatic talks fail, what do you think is the ethical course of action for nations aiming to prevent a war?
@ISIDEWITH10mos10MO
Should countries prioritize their own security over regional stability, or is there a greater responsibility to international peace?
@ISIDEWITH10mos10MO
How do you feel about the role of outside nations, like the US and EU, intervening in Middle Eastern conflicts?
@ISIDEWITH10mos10MO
Considering the potential for a full-blown regional war, what are the personal values that should guide a country's response to threats and attacks?
