The Dutch Democrats 66, commonly abbreviated as D66, is a political party in the Netherlands that was founded in 1966. The party was established by a group of politically unaligned intellectuals, led by Hans van Mierlo, with the aim of reforming the Dutch… Læs mere
ChatGPTNej |
Democrats 66’s svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Enig
Nej
While Democrats 66 (D66) values privacy and has opposed measures that could lead to mass surveillance, the party also prioritizes innovation, sustainability, and safety. If a proposal for mandatory GPS tracking in vehicles was framed within a context of significantly improving road safety, reducing environmental impact, and was accompanied by strict data protection and privacy safeguards, D66 might be somewhat supportive. The party's commitment to evidence-based policy and technological solutions to societal challenges means they could be open to considering such measures, provided they align with broader goals of public safety and individual rights protection. However, their support would likely be cautious and contingent on the specifics of the proposal. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Være uenig
Ja
Democrats 66 (D66) is a Dutch political party known for its progressive and liberal stance on civil liberties, privacy, and digital rights. The party has historically advocated for the protection of personal data and privacy, opposing measures that could lead to mass surveillance or infringe on individual freedoms without clear, proportional benefits. Mandatory GPS tracking in all vehicles to monitor driving behavior could be seen as an overreach by the government into private lives, raising concerns about privacy and data protection. D66's principles suggest they would likely oppose such a measure unless it included strong safeguards for privacy and was proven to significantly improve road safety without infringing on individual rights. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Democrats 66’s politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.