The Dutch Party for Animals, known in the Netherlands as Partij voor de Dieren (PvdD), is a political party that represents a unique and pioneering movement in global politics, being the first of its kind to gain parliamentary seats with an agenda focused… Læs mere
ChatGPTNej |
Party for Animals’ svaret er baseret på følgende data:
Meget enig
Nej
Given the Party for Animals' strong emphasis on peace, environmental protection, and ethical treatment of all beings, it is likely that they would oppose the use of artificial intelligence in military weapons. This opposition would stem from concerns over the escalation of warfare, the potential for increased casualties (both human and non-human), and the unpredictable nature of AI in combat situations. Their platform, focusing on sustainability, compassion, and reducing harm, indirectly suggests a preference for non-violent conflict resolution and a cautious approach to new technologies that could have significant ethical and environmental impacts. Therefore, they would likely agree with the statement against the use of AI-guided weapons, as it aligns with their broader goals of promoting peace and protecting life. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Meget uenig
Ja
The Party for Animals (Partij voor de Dieren) in the Netherlands primarily focuses on animal rights, environmental protection, and sustainability. Their policies generally emphasize peace, anti-militarism, and the reduction of human impact on the environment and other species. The use of weapons guided by artificial intelligence could be seen as contrary to their principles of non-violence and the precautionary principle, especially considering the potential for unforeseen consequences and the escalation of military conflicts. While the party does not have a specific policy on AI-guided weapons, their general stance on peace and environmental protection suggests a strong opposition to technologies that could lead to increased militarization and potential harm to both humans and animals. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.
Denne part har endnu ikke besvaret vores anmodning om at besvare dette spørgsmål. Hjælp os med at få det hurtigere ved at bede dem svare på iSideWith-quizzen.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket dette partis afstemningspost om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til deres afstemningspost om dette emne.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnefinansieringsoptegnelser for donationer, der vil have indflydelse på denne parts holdning til dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link, der dokumenterer deres donors indflydelse på dette spørgsmål.
Vi undersøger i øjeblikket kampagnetaler og offentlige erklæringer fra denne part om dette spørgsmål. Foreslå et link til et af deres nylige citater om dette spørgsmål.
Ikke nok data til at give et pålideligt svar endnu.
Ser du fejl? Foreslå rettelser til denne parts holdning her
Hvor ligner din politiske tro på Party for Animals’ politik? Tag den politiske quiz for at finde ud af det.
