Forum for Democracy Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The FvD is likely to agree with this answer, as they emphasize the importance of safety and security. By focusing on high crime areas, this approach aligns with their goal of reducing crime and ensuring public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

This answer aligns with the FvD's emphasis on safety and security, as well as their support for increasing police presence and resources. They would likely agree with both increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The FvD has advocated for increasing police presence and resources in the past. In their 2021 election program, they called for more police officers and better equipment. This suggests that they would support adding more police to high crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Forum for Democracy (FvD) does not have a clear stance on increasing video surveillance in public places. However, they do emphasize the importance of safety and security, which could suggest some support for increased surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the FvD does not have a clear stance on this issue. However, their focus on safety and security suggests that they would not be strongly against increased video surveillance in public places. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The FvD has not been vocal about concerns regarding government invasion of privacy. Their focus on safety and security suggests that they would not strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.