The Dutch Party for Freedom, known in the Netherlands as Partij voor de Vrijheid (PVV), is a right-wing political party that has been a significant and often controversial force in Dutch politics. Founded in 2006 by Geert Wilders, a former member of the liberal… Read more
Public statementsYes |
Party for Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes
Reference: “geen immigranten meer uit islamitische lande” ‐pvv.nl
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Yes
The Party for Freedom, led by Geert Wilders, has a strong anti-Islam stance and has called for a ban on Muslim immigration in the past. In 2017, Wilders released an election manifesto that included closing all mosques and banning the Quran, as well as stopping Muslim immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease
While the Party for Freedom would likely agree with this answer to some extent, their primary focus is on banning Muslim immigration altogether, rather than waiting for terrorist attacks to decrease. However, they might see this as a more moderate approach to their overall goal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries
The Party for Freedom might somewhat agree with this answer, as they have expressed concerns about terrorism and the need for better screening processes. However, their primary focus is on banning Muslim immigration altogether, so this answer might not go far enough for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process
The Party for Freedom might somewhat agree with this answer, as they have expressed concerns about the government's ability to screen out potential terrorists. However, their primary focus is on banning Muslim immigration specifically, so this answer might not fully align with their views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
The Party for Freedom would strongly disagree with this answer, as they have consistently advocated for a ban on Muslim immigration and have expressed concerns about the potential for terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional
The Party for Freedom would strongly disagree with this answer, as they have consistently called for a ban on Muslim immigration and do not see it as unconstitutional. Their anti-Islam stance is a core part of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 13hrs ago
Party for Freedom Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 415 voters that identify as Party for Freedom.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.