@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@9H5VM575mos5MO
No, but housing provision should also be made for those who don’t want/aren’t able to live in a busy communal environment.
@9H3LC4B5mos5MO
if there is adequate shelter and programming available, they should not be allowed to camp. if there is not, they should be allowed to camp and additional programs for food/clothing/medicine should be promoted in tandem with social workers staying in close contact with groups facing the issues
@9GXXFPFDemocrats 666mos6MO
Work on identifying relationship of homelessness with societal disintegration and address long term social dimensions. In short run create special programs to rehabilitate homeless persons permanently.
@9GTBGGH6mos6MO
No, depending on the situation. Some public places should not be allowed. We need to create social programs to provide them free space with food and clothing, and medicine
@9GPSC3WGreen Left6mos6MO
Not in all public property, but make sure there are other places they can stay and have access to food, clothing and healthcare.
No, but make shelter and housing better to decrease chance of refusal
@9BDKC2T1yr1Y
Depends on the quality of the available shelter or housing.
@99P75531yr1Y
Let’s find out why they won’t go into a shelter first
@99LX9KK1yr1Y
The government should ensure homeless have guranteed shelter.
@8ZPTGKN2yrs2Y
No, only if available shelter or housing was safe.
@8ZP6Z8V2yrs2Y
If the shelter of housing is safe and they still refused it, then they are not allowed to sleep on public property.
@8YH77T42yrs2Y
Yes, but only if they don't cause any nuisance.
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in designated encampment areas that do not interfere with the daily commerce of businesses. Utilize state and community social programs (and create more, if necessary) to provide free food, clothing and medicine, and continue to offer available shelter or housing
@8XVQSC52yrs2Y
They shouldn't get criminal records or anything, but it also depends on the area. There should be areas designated for homeless people to be able to encamp or sleep. Some shelters don't allow dogs/cats and their owners need them for emotional support because there is probably mental health issues going on too.
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in designated encampment areas that do not interfere with the daily commerce of businesses. Utilize existing social programs to provide free food, clothing and medicine, and continue to offer available shelter or housing
@95S7WDY2yrs2Y
create programs that allow them to get help to better themselves
@94YDFJW2yrs2Y
Yes, and as individuals we should try to help within reason
@DengekiMatsuko2yrs2Y
We should create a program to give all homeless citizens somewhere to live
@9425J2G2yrs2Y
"Everything" is now public or government property. Homeless should be allowed to seek/find/make safe shelter where it does not affect others. As well as be held responsible for that areas well being.
@93ZQDBJ2yrs2Y
Yes, as long as the owner of the public property consents and the homeless person isn’t harming others.
@8VGD9NG2yrs2Y
It should be up to the owner of the property
@OneMohrTime2yrs2Y
No, but open outdoor spaces where it is allowed should be provided
@7PTCG382yrs2Y
Yes, but in designated encampment areas that do not interfere with the commerce of businesses. Utilize existing social programs to provide free food, clothing and medicine, and continue to offer available shelter or housing
@8VG8DZB2yrs2Y
Yes, but only outside of city limits.
@93VGL9L2yrs2Y
No, but ensure there are services and funding to shelter them in the way they need to be sheltered and feel safe (which may not be in a conventional homeless shelter). Also expand shelters that take in entire families. Many people turn down shelter because it requires breaking up their family (many don't allow husbands/fathers, etc.)
@32LNXXJ2yrs2Y
No, but create more social programs to provide free food, clothing and medicine as well as better and safer shelters as current are not at all "safe" spaces, which is why many refuse to stay.
@JoeStephens9992yrs2Y
Depends where the property is and what its use is for.
@4HNKVKT2yrs2Y
Yes, but designated areas. Increase social programs for food, clothing and medicine and do not allow panhandling. Give people the resources they need to get back on their feet but don't allow panhandling to be a way of life.
@93MSBYT2yrs2Y
Yes, but still protected outdoor shelters and not within a certain distance from schools
@93LVQCY2yrs2Y
It depends on how close the public property is to a residential home or neighborhood.
@Ovrwatch222yrs2Y
Yes, but not public property within city limits.
@924MYCK2yrs2Y
Yes, but only if the owners signed something allowing for the homeless to encamp on their property, as long as they don't hurt or bother anybody. Otherwise, create more social programs to provide basic necessities such as food and water, clothing, shelter, etc. if they need it.
@EthanHars2yrs2Y
No, force them to join military
@8P8MHKS2yrs2Y
No, because I question the quality or intentions of the offers for shelter.
@93HNT692yrs2Y
If they are given available shelter and housing and they refuse it then that is your own fault that you aren't allowed to sleep on public property.
@8TBSRN22yrs2Y
Yes, as long as it is not on private property.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...