Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsscience9mos ago

Should the government fund research into genetic engineering for disease prevention and treatment?

Genetic engineering involves modifying the DNA of organisms to prevent or treat diseases. Proponents argue that it could lead to breakthroughs in curing genetic disorders and improving public health. Opponents argue that it raises ethical concerns and potential risks of unintended consequences.

13 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9mos9MO

Yes

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...9mos9MO

No

 @9T9MQTQanswered…5mos5MO

Disease prevention through investing in education on optimal diets, taxing high calorie and artificial foods, making vegetables and fruits clean and affordable for all, and securing space for outside exercise and teaching yoga in schools.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Do you think altering genes to eliminate diseases crosses an ethical line, or is it just a natural progression of science?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Would you want to know if your DNA had been engineered, or do you think the results matter more than the process?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How might society change if everyone could eliminate health risks or enhance abilities using genetic engineering?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Is there a trait or characteristic you would want to change about yourself if genetic modification were available?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

What fears come to mind when you think about modifying the DNA of living organisms, and are those fears valid?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Should all people have equal access to genetic engineering, or is it okay if only those who can afford it use it?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How do you think genetically modified humans would be treated in society—is it more likely to bring equality or division?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Would you support genetic engineering if it were only used for medical purposes, or does that still raise concerns for you?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

Is it more dangerous for us to not explore the benefits of genetic engineering, or to take the risk of using it without fully understanding the consequences?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…5mos5MO

How would you feel if genetic engineering could allow you to choose certain traits in your future children?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2wks2W

Jon Stewart Begs Democrats To ‘Please Stop Trotting Out Chuck Schumer!'

Jon Stewart criticized Democrats for repeatedly using Chuck Schumer as their spokesperson against Trump, calling his performances ineffective and monotonous.Stewart mocked Schumer's response to Trump's trade war threats, particularly his simplistic explanation about Mexican imports like Corona beer and avocados.The former Daily Show host expressed frustration at Schumer's basic observation that "guacamole is made of avocados" as a response to complex trade policy issues.Stewart sarcastically highlighted the Democrats' poor strategic choice in selecting Schumer to counter Trump, whom he described as "one of the most savvy presidential media manipulators in history."The comedian ridiculed Schumer's appearance and presentation style, particularly mocking his use of reading glasses positioned low on his nose.Stewart's criticism centered on the Democratic leadership's judgment in repeatedly choosing an "uninteresting" and "monotone" spokesperson.The commentary addressed Trump's threats of tariffs against Canada and Mexico, though focused more on the Democratic response than the policy itself.Stewart used hyperbole to emphasize his point, stating that Schumer's speaking makes him "want to bomb Canada."The piece highlighted the perceived disconnect between Democratic messaging strategy and effective opposition to Trump's policies.Stewart's criticism suggested a broader frustration with Democratic leadership's media strategy and public presentation.

▲  4817 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…1wk1W

Gavin Newsom Defends Immigrants With $25 Million

Governor Newsom signed legislation allocating $50 million total to protect California's policies from Trump administration challenges and defend immigrants facing deportation, split evenly between the state's DOJ and legal defense groups.The funding comes as California anticipates renewed conflicts with Trump's administration, following over 100 legal actions against his first term policies on issues including climate, water, and immigration.Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas justified the funding by characterizing the Trump administration as "out-of-control" and threatening to Californians' constitutional rights.The signing occurred just after Newsom's Washington visit to secure federal disaster aid for January's devastating Los Angeles wildfires, which claimed more than two dozen lives.California recently enacted a separate $2.5 billion fire relief package, with expectations of federal reimbursement for disaster response costs.Republican lawmakers criticized the legal defense funding as a political distraction from wildfire recovery efforts, with State Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones calling it a "slush fund."Critics raised concerns about the possibility of funds being used to defend immigrants with serious felony convictions, though Newsom indicated this wasn't the intended purpose.The legislation emerged from a special session Newsom called shortly after Trump's election in November, demonstrating California's proactive stance against anticipated federal challenges.During Trump's first term, California initiated more than 120 lawsuits against his administration, spending approximately $42 million on legal battles.Annual legal expenses fighting federal policies during Trump's first term ranged from $2 million to nearly $13 million per year.

▲  1120 replies