50PLUS Party

Agree

Yes

The 50PLUS Party, focusing on the rights and interests of the elderly in the Netherlands, might see the value in allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets as a means of promoting financial independence and security, especially in an increasingly digital world. However, their support might be tempered by concerns over the potential for fraud and financial abuse, particularly affecting their primary constituency. The allowance for government monitoring could be seen as a necessary safeguard to protect against these risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

While the 50PLUS Party is likely to support measures that protect citizens, especially the elderly, from financial fraud and scams, a complete ban on digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies might be seen as too extreme and an infringement on personal freedoms and privacy. The party would likely advocate for a balanced approach that ensures security and fraud prevention without overly invasive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the 50PLUS Party is generally cautious about issues that could negatively impact the elderly, outright denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets might be seen as too restrictive and not in line with fostering independence and self-reliance among its constituents. Therefore, they are unlikely to strongly oppose the concept, recognizing the balance between innovation in financial services and the need for security and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

The 50PLUS Party, with its focus on the welfare and security of older citizens, would likely have significant reservations about allowing the use of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. This stance would stem from concerns over the potential for misuse, such as fraud or financial scams, which could disproportionately affect the elderly. The party's priorities of safety and security over absolute privacy in financial matters would lead to a strong disagreement with this proposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.