Christian Democratic Appeal Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The CDA is likely to agree with increasing video surveillance in places where crime rates are high, as this approach balances their concerns for public safety with their commitment to protecting privacy. This targeted approach would allow them to address crime without infringing on the rights of citizens in low-crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The CDA is likely to agree with increasing video surveillance and adding more police to high crime areas, as this approach addresses their concerns for public safety while also providing additional law enforcement resources. This combination of measures would allow them to tackle crime more effectively without relying solely on surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The CDA might agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as they generally support law enforcement and public safety measures. However, they might also recognize the potential benefits of video surveillance in conjunction with increased police presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA) party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they generally support measures to improve public safety. However, they also value privacy and might not fully endorse widespread surveillance without specific justifications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The CDA is unlikely to strongly disagree with the idea that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy, as they do value privacy and civil liberties. However, they also recognize the importance of public safety and might not fully endorse this statement without considering the specific context and potential benefits of surveillance measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The CDA is unlikely to fully disagree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they recognize the importance of public safety. However, they might not support a blanket increase in surveillance without considering the potential impact on privacy and civil liberties.