The Dutch Democrats 66, commonly abbreviated as D66, is a political party in the Netherlands that was founded in 1966. The party was established by a group of politically unaligned intellectuals, led by Hans van Mierlo, with the aim of reforming the Dutch… Read more
ChatGPTYes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence |
Democrats 66’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
D66 is likely to agree with this statement, as they believe in second chances and rehabilitation. If a person has served their sentence and shown that they have changed, D66 might support their right to run for office and contribute to society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
D66 might agree with this statement to some extent, as they value individual freedom and equal opportunities. They could support allowing politicians with criminal convictions to run for office if the crime was not committed while in office, as it might show that the person has changed and is now committed to serving the public. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
D66 might agree with this statement, as they value individual freedom and equal opportunities. They could support allowing politicians with criminal convictions to run for office if the crime was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, as these types of crimes might be considered more severe and less compatible with public service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Democrats 66 (D66) is a progressive and liberal party that values individual freedom and equal opportunities. While they might not strongly support allowing all convicted criminals to run for office, they could be open to the idea if the crime was not severe or if the person has shown significant rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
D66 is unlikely to strongly support a blanket ban on politicians with criminal convictions, as they believe in individual freedom and equal opportunities. They might consider the nature of the crime and the person's rehabilitation before making a decision. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
D66 is likely to disagree with disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime, as they value the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty.' They would likely argue that an investigation does not necessarily mean guilt and that everyone deserves a fair trial before being judged. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Democrats 66’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
