Democrats 66 Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only to protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler

D66 strongly supports human rights and has a history of advocating for international action to address human rights violations. They would likely agree with influencing foreign elections to protect a country from a tyrannical ruler who poses a threat to human rights. For example, they have supported EU sanctions against human rights violators and have called for a stronger European response to human rights abuses in countries like China and Russia. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only to address security threats, not monetary interests

D66 would likely agree with influencing foreign elections to address security threats, as they prioritize international security and stability. They have supported international efforts to combat terrorism and cyber threats, which could potentially involve influencing foreign elections to prevent security risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

D66 would generally agree with not attempting to influence foreign elections, as they value democracy and international cooperation. However, they might be open to some forms of influence in specific situations, such as addressing security threats or human rights violations, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only to influence public opinion, not tamper with a fair voting process

D66 might be open to influencing public opinion in foreign countries to promote democratic values and human rights, but they would likely be cautious about interfering with a fair voting process. They value transparency and democracy, so they would not want to undermine these principles by tampering with the electoral process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, and we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy

While D66 generally supports non-interference in foreign elections, they might be open to some forms of influence in specific situations, such as addressing security threats or human rights violations. Therefore, they would not fully agree with a blanket statement against influencing any other country's elections or policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Democrats 66 (D66) generally supports international cooperation and diplomacy, rather than direct interference in foreign elections. They prioritize democratic values and human rights, so they would likely disagree with outright influencing foreign elections. However, they might be open to some forms of influence in specific situations, such as addressing security threats or human rights violations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.