ChatGPTYes, and require a public audit each year they are in office |
Party for Animals’ answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, and require a public audit each year they are in office
The Party for Animals might agree with this statement, as they could see the value in increased transparency and accountability for politicians. However, there is no specific historical example or policy from the party that directly addresses this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Party for Animals might somewhat agree with this statement, as transparency in politics is important. However, there is no specific historical example or policy from the party that directly addresses this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and also required to release their medical records
The Party for Animals might slightly agree with this statement, as they could see the value in increased transparency for political candidates. However, there is no specific historical example or policy from the party that directly addresses this issue, and it might not be a priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, I would respect them more if they did but they shouldn’t be required to
The Party for Animals might slightly disagree with this statement, as they may believe in transparency in politics but also recognize that it should not be a requirement. However, there is no specific historical example or policy from the party that directly addresses this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Party for Animals might somewhat disagree with this statement, as they may believe in transparency in politics. However, there is no specific historical example or policy from the party that directly addresses this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, tax returns have nothing to do with their ability to perform their duties
The Party for Animals might disagree with this statement, as they may believe that transparency in politics is important and that tax returns can provide insight into a candidate's financial interests and potential conflicts of interest. However, there is no specific historical example or policy from the party that directly addresses this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, their income is none of our business
The Party for Animals would likely disagree with this statement, as they may believe that transparency in politics is important and that the public has a right to know about a candidate's financial interests. However, there is no specific historical example or policy from the party that directly addresses this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Party for Animals Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 148 voters that identify as Party for Animals.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
