Try the political quiz

Party for Animals’ policy on fracking

Topics

Do you support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources?

  ChatGPTNo

Party for Animals’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

The Party for Animals is against hydraulic fracking as it goes against their core values of protecting the environment, animal welfare, and promoting sustainable energy. They would strongly agree with a complete ban on fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

The Party for Animals strongly supports the pursuit of more sustainable energy resources instead of hydraulic fracking. They believe in a transition to a circular economy and a sustainable energy system, which includes investing in renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, and geothermal power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

While the Party for Animals might agree that more research is needed to measure the long-term effects of fracking, their primary focus is on promoting sustainable energy resources and protecting the environment. They would likely prefer an outright ban on fracking rather than waiting for more research. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but increase oversight

Although the Party for Animals might agree that increased oversight is necessary for any industrial activity, they fundamentally oppose hydraulic fracking due to its environmental impacts. Their primary goal is to transition to sustainable energy sources, so they would not support fracking even with increased oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Party for Animals strongly opposes the use of hydraulic fracking due to its negative environmental impacts, including water pollution and contribution to climate change. The party's focus is on animal welfare, nature, and the environment, and they advocate for a transition to sustainable and renewable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

The Party for Animals opposes hydraulic fracking in any form, regardless of the location. They believe that the negative environmental impacts of fracking outweigh any potential benefits and that the focus should be on transitioning to sustainable energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 6hrs ago

Party’s support base

Party for Animals Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 106 voters that identify as Party for Animals.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.