Party for Animals

Agree

Decrease

The Party for Animals would likely support a decrease in military spending. They believe in a peaceful world and would prefer funds to be allocated towards animal welfare, nature conservation, and environmental protection. However, they have not explicitly stated a position on military spending, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead

The Party for Animals might be open to the idea of a European military defense system as a means of promoting peace and reducing individual countries' military spending. However, their primary focus is on animal rights, nature, and environment, so this is not a key issue for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

While the Party for Animals has not explicitly stated a position on military spending, their focus on animal rights, nature, and environment suggests they would prefer funds to be allocated towards these areas rather than maintaining the current level of military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

The Party for Animals would likely not support an increase in military spending, even if the deficit is drastically reduced. Their focus is on animal rights, nature, and environment, and they would prefer funds to be allocated towards these areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Increase

The Party for Animals is primarily focused on animal rights, nature, and environment. They believe in a peaceful world and are not likely to support an increase in military spending. Instead, they would prefer funds to be allocated towards animal welfare, nature conservation, and environmental protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.