The Dutch Party for Animals, known in the Netherlands as Partij voor de Dieren (PvdD), is a political party that represents a unique and pioneering movement in global politics, being the first of its kind to gain parliamentary seats with an agenda focused… Read more
ChatGPTNo |
Party for Animals’ answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No
Given the Party for Animals' emphasis on privacy, civil liberties, and a cautious approach to technology that may infringe on individual freedoms, it is likely that they would support the stance against the use of facial recognition technology for mass surveillance. Their platform, while primarily focused on animal rights and environmental sustainability, also touches upon human rights and the importance of protecting individual freedoms against government overreach. Although there is no direct statement from the party regarding facial recognition technology, their general political philosophy suggests they would lean towards opposing measures that could lead to mass surveillance and potentially compromise privacy and personal freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Party for Animals (Partij voor de Dieren) in the Netherlands generally prioritizes individual freedoms and is particularly concerned about privacy issues, aligning with a broader skepticism towards mass surveillance within Dutch politics. Although their primary focus is on animal rights and environmental issues, their political platform often intersects with broader concerns about civil liberties and government overreach. The use of facial recognition technology for mass surveillance could be seen as a threat to personal privacy and freedom, which is likely to be opposed by the party. There is no specific historical reference to the party's stance on facial recognition technology, but their general advocacy for privacy and cautious approach to technology that may infringe on individual rights suggests a strong disagreement with mass surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
