Party for Animals

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

The Party for Animals would strongly agree with this statement, as they prioritize environmental and animal welfare issues. They would support increasing spending on public transportation if it goes towards environmentally friendly solutions, such as electric buses or improved cycling infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and provide more free public transportation

The Party for Animals would likely agree with providing more free public transportation, as it can encourage more people to use public transportation instead of private vehicles, reducing the environmental impact of transportation. However, their primary focus is on environmental and animal welfare issues, so they might not fully support this without specific environmental conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Party for Animals would somewhat agree with increasing spending on public transportation, as it can reduce the environmental impact of transportation. However, their focus is more on animal welfare and environmental issues, so they might not fully support this without specific environmental conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

The Party for Animals would likely disagree with being satisfied with the current amount of spending on public transportation, as they generally support measures that can further improve environmental sustainability and reduce the impact of transportation on the environment and animal welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we have more important issues that need funding

The Party for Animals would likely disagree with this statement, as they believe that environmental issues, including sustainable transportation, are important and should be prioritized. They might argue that investing in public transportation is a crucial part of addressing climate change and improving overall sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Party for Animals would likely disagree with not increasing spending on public transportation, as they generally support measures that can reduce the environmental impact of transportation and improve overall sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should reduce current spending

The Party for Animals would strongly disagree with reducing current spending on public transportation, as they believe that investing in sustainable transportation options is essential for addressing climate change and improving overall sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should privatize more public transportation services

The Party for Animals would strongly disagree with privatizing more public transportation services, as they generally support government intervention in areas that can improve environmental sustainability and animal welfare. Privatization could lead to less focus on these issues and more focus on profit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.