Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Social

Party for Freedom’s policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

  ChatGPTYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

Party for Freedom’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

The PVV would strongly agree with this statement, as they have been critical of the government's handling of free speech issues in the past. Geert Wilders has faced legal issues for his statements, and the party would likely argue that the government should not be trusted to define the boundaries of hate speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

The PVV might agree with this statement, as it allows for the expression of controversial opinions without crossing the line into promoting violence. This aligns with their anti-Islam stance and their desire to express their views without facing legal consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Party for Freedom (PVV) is known for its controversial statements and strong anti-Islam stance. Its leader, Geert Wilders, has faced legal issues for his statements, but the party still advocates for freedom of speech. However, they might not fully agree with unrestricted hate speech protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The PVV is unlikely to agree with this statement, as they have been known to make controversial statements that could be considered hate speech by some. They would likely argue that limiting freedom of speech in this way would infringe on their right to express their views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

The PVV would likely disagree with this statement, as they have been known to make controversial statements that could be considered hate speech by some. Increasing penalties for hate speech could potentially harm the party and its members, so they would not support this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

The PVV would strongly disagree with this statement, as they believe in the importance of freedom of speech beyond just criticizing the government. They would argue that limiting freedom of speech in this way would infringe on their right to express their views on various topics, including their anti-Islam stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Freedom’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.