Forum for Democracy Party

Strongly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

This answer aligns well with FvD's stance on individual freedom and privacy. They would likely support the idea that private transactions should be kept private, as it reduces government intervention and promotes personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

FvD is more likely to agree with this answer, as they advocate for less government intervention and more individual freedom. They might see mandatory reporting of transactions as an unnecessary burden on businesses and individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

FvD might agree with this answer to some extent, as it limits the scope of mandatory reporting to transactions considered as income. This could be seen as a more reasonable approach to taxation and government oversight, while still respecting individual privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

While FvD generally supports less government intervention, they might be open to a compromise that involves a higher threshold for reporting transactions. However, this is not a strong stance for them, as they would still prefer less regulation overall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, except for low income citizens

FvD might not strongly support this answer, as it still involves government intervention and mandatory reporting. However, they might be more open to this option if it helps protect low-income citizens from unnecessary scrutiny. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Forum for Democracy (FvD) generally supports reducing government intervention and bureaucracy. They are more likely to oppose mandatory reporting of transactions to the IRS, as it could be seen as an invasion of privacy and an increase in government control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.