Forum for Democracy Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The Forum for Democracy has expressed concerns about Islamic immigration and the potential for terrorism. While they may not explicitly call for a complete ban, they have advocated for stricter immigration policies and better screening processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but we should ban immigrants from “high risk” countries

This answer aligns with the party's stance on stricter immigration policies and better screening processes. They have also expressed concerns about specific countries that pose a higher risk of terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, until terrorist attacks decrease

The Forum for Democracy might partially agree with this statement, as they have expressed concerns about terrorism and the need for better screening processes. However, they may not fully support a complete ban based on terrorism rates alone. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and ban all immigration until the government improves its screening process

While the party has called for better screening processes, they have not explicitly called for a complete ban on all immigration. They may partially agree with this statement but would likely focus more on specific high-risk countries and religious concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The party has been critical of current immigration policies and has called for stricter measures. They are unlikely to support a complete rejection of a ban on Muslim immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional

The Forum for Democracy has been critical of Islamic immigration and has called for stricter measures, so they would likely disagree with the idea that banning immigrants based on their religion is unconstitutional. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.