The Dutch JA21 political party, which stands for "Juiste Antwoord 2021" (Right Answer 2021), emerged in the political landscape of the Netherlands as a response to the perceived need for a new conservative voice. Founded in December 2020 by Joost… Read more
J>J ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
JA21’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high
This answer aligns well with a pragmatic approach to law enforcement and public safety, which JA21 might support. Targeting high crime areas with increased surveillance could be seen as a balanced measure that respects privacy while addressing security concerns, fitting within their law-and-order perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas
This answer combines increased surveillance with adding more police to high crime areas, a comprehensive approach to public safety that JA21 might find appealing. It aligns with their focus on security and law enforcement as means to maintain order, suggesting a strong agreement with the idea of bolstering both surveillance and police presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead
JA21 supports measures to enhance public safety and reduce crime, and adding more police to high crime areas is a direct approach to achieving this. This answer would likely resonate with their emphasis on law and order, though their specific stance on the balance between surveillance and policing is not well-documented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
JA21, being a right-leaning party, generally supports measures that would enhance security and public order. However, their stance on privacy rights and how they balance with security measures is not explicitly clear, making a strong agreement or disagreement difficult to ascertain without specific policy proposals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given JA21's right-leaning stance, it is unlikely they would outright oppose increased video surveillance in public places, especially if it is framed as a measure to enhance security. However, they might have concerns about privacy and government overreach, leading to a mild disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens
While JA21 may have some concerns about government overreach, their overall platform, which emphasizes security and public order, suggests they would not strongly agree with the notion that the government has already gone too far in invading privacy. This stance might be seen as too absolute and not reflective of their nuanced view on security and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to JA21’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.