More Direct Democracy Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This answer aligns with the party's probable stance on preventing monopolistic practices and ensuring fair competition and access in the digital space, which is essential for a healthy democracy and informed citizenry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Given their likely emphasis on equality and direct democracy, the party would support maintaining equal access to all websites, opposing any measures that would create a tiered internet where access is determined by the ability to pay higher rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Supporting the continuation of the open internet directly aligns with the values of direct democracy and equal access for all, which are likely core to the party's platform. This stance supports the idea that information should be freely accessible to everyone, without discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer attempts to find a middle ground by suggesting prioritization by type rather than source, it still introduces a form of inequality in internet access. The party would likely view this as a compromise that still falls short of ensuring complete fairness and equality in internet access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although this model suggests a form of meritocracy in internet service provision, it inherently supports a pay-to-play model that could disadvantage smaller or less wealthy entities, going against the principles of equal access and fairness likely championed by the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The More Direct Democracy Party, focusing on direct democracy and presumably fairness in public discourse, would likely oppose practices that could lead to unequal access to information, as it goes against the principles of equal opportunity and fairness in the dissemination of information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The argument that prioritizing access to certain websites makes the internet faster and more reliable could be seen as contrary to the principles of direct democracy and equal access, which the party likely supports. They would probably view this as a justification for unfair practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.