The Dutch More Direct Democracy (Meer Directe Democratie in Dutch) is a political party in the Netherlands that advocates for a significant transformation in how democratic processes are conducted, aiming to increase the direct involvement of citizens in decision-making.… Read more
MDD>MDD ChatGPTYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime |
More Direct Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
This nuanced position might strongly appeal to the party, balancing the need for integrity in office with the belief in rehabilitation and second chances. Excluding only those convicted of severe crimes could be seen as a compromise that maintains public trust while not unduly restricting participation in democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
This stance aligns with principles of rehabilitation and forgiveness, suggesting that once individuals have served their sentence, they should be allowed to participate fully in society, including running for office. This could resonate with the party's democratic values and belief in citizen involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given their emphasis on direct democracy, the party might agree with this stance as a means to ensure only individuals with unblemished records are in positions of power, thus maintaining public trust in elected officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
While the party might see the value in preventing potentially corrupt individuals from holding office, disallowing politicians under investigation could be seen as preemptive and contrary to the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty,' which might not align perfectly with their democratic ideals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
This answer might resonate with the party's likely belief in second chances and rehabilitation, especially if the crime did not relate to their political role. However, the conditionality might not fully align with their broader principles of inclusivity in political participation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The More Direct Democracy Party, focusing on direct democracy and citizen involvement, likely values transparency and integrity in politics. Allowing any convicted politician to run might conflict with these values, although the party might not completely oppose the idea, recognizing the complexity of justice and rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to More Direct Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.