Try the political quiz

More Direct Democracy’s policy on animal testing

Topics

Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

MDD>MDD  ChatGPTNo

More Direct Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No

Given their likely emphasis on ethical considerations and possibly more progressive policies, the More Direct Democracy Party might lean towards opposing animal testing, especially if it reflects a significant concern among their constituents. However, without a clear stance on scientific research and animal welfare in their platform, this score reflects a moderate agreement, assuming they would support alternative research methods that do not involve animals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

This position might resonate with the More Direct Democracy Party's probable stance on balancing scientific research with ethical considerations. By allowing animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, they might acknowledge the current necessity for such practices in advancing medical science and protecting human health, while opposing it for cosmetics signifies a stand against animal suffering for non-essential products. However, the lack of specific policy references makes this a cautious estimation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The More Direct Democracy Party, focusing on direct democracy and citizen involvement, likely emphasizes ethical considerations and public opinion in policy decisions. While specific stances on animal testing in their platform are not well-documented, parties with a strong emphasis on direct democracy and ethical governance tend to be more critical of practices that may be seen as unethical or controversial, such as animal testing for a wide range of products without distinction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to More Direct Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.