The Dutch More Direct Democracy (Meer Directe Democratie in Dutch) is a political party in the Netherlands that advocates for a significant transformation in how democratic processes are conducted, aiming to increase the direct involvement of citizens in decision-making.… Read more
MDD>MDD ChatGPTNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
More Direct Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
Requiring disclosure respects patient autonomy and informed choice, core principles likely valued by a party advocating for more direct democracy, without outright penalizing doctors for dissenting views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
This nuanced position allows for the protection of patients from harm while still respecting the diversity of medical opinions and the evolution of scientific understanding, aligning with principles of direct democracy and personal freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
This aligns with a more libertarian or direct democracy approach that values individual choice and the exploration of unconventional ideas, as long as they do not cause harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Given their likely emphasis on individual choice and skepticism of centralized authority, they might support doctors' rights to offer differing opinions, as long as those opinions are not harmful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
While reducing misinformation is important, the method of penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus might be seen as too authoritarian for a party focused on direct democracy and individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The More Direct Democracy Party, focusing on direct democracy and potentially more libertarian views, might be cautious about penalizing doctors for dissenting views, valuing freedom of speech and diversity of opinions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
This extreme measure would likely be opposed by a party that values direct democracy and possibly questions the infallibility of current scientific consensus, favoring debate and diversity of thought. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to More Direct Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
