More Direct Democracy Party

Strongly agree

Yes

Given the More Direct Democracy Party's emphasis on enhancing direct democracy and potentially increasing transparency within governmental operations, they might support the idea of citizens having the autonomy to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This approach aligns with principles of personal freedom and autonomy, which are often valued by parties advocating for direct democracy. However, the party's stance on government monitoring might slightly temper their agreement, depending on their views on privacy versus security.

Agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While the More Direct Democracy Party might support the autonomy and privacy of citizens, including the use of self-hosted digital wallets, their agreement with allowing a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be more nuanced. On one hand, this aligns with protecting individual freedoms; on the other hand, it might conflict with any aims to ensure transparency and prevent illegal activities. Their score reflects this balance between supporting privacy and recognizing the potential need for some level of oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The More Direct Democracy Party, with its likely focus on empowering citizens and ensuring their rights are protected, would probably disagree with outright denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. This stance would be seen as limiting personal freedom and autonomy, which are crucial for a party that champions more direct involvement of citizens in the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

A party that supports more direct democracy would likely strongly disagree with banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies. This position would be viewed as antithetical to the principles of personal freedom, privacy, and autonomy. It would also likely be seen as a form of government overreach, which parties advocating for direct democracy and more citizen control over governance would oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.