Try the political quiz

People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

  ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high

People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The VVD is likely to agree with this answer, as they support targeted measures to improve public safety in high crime areas. They have previously advocated for the use of surveillance cameras in specific locations where crime rates are high, such as in the city of Rotterdam. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

This answer aligns well with the VVD's stance on public safety. They support both the use of video surveillance in high crime areas and increasing police presence. Their 2021 election program called for more police officers and better equipment for law enforcement, as well as targeted surveillance measures in specific locations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The VVD supports increasing police presence in high crime areas as a way to improve public safety. In their 2021 election program, they called for more police officers and better equipment for law enforcement. However, they do not completely reject the use of video surveillance, so this answer does not fully align with their stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) generally supports measures to improve public safety, but they do not have a strong stance on increasing video surveillance in all public places. Their focus is more on effective policing and maintaining a balance between security and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The VVD is not against video surveillance in public places, but they do not advocate for it as a blanket solution. They are more likely to support targeted measures to improve public safety while respecting privacy concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The VVD is not strongly against the use of video surveillance in public places, but they do recognize the importance of balancing security and privacy. They are unlikely to agree with the statement that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy, as they generally support targeted surveillance measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 10hrs ago

Party’s support base

People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,221 voters that identify as People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.