Socialist Party

Agree

Yes

The Socialist Party (SP) in the Netherlands generally advocates for policies that protect individual freedoms while also ensuring a level of government oversight to prevent abuse and ensure fairness. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets with government monitoring aligns with the party's approach to balance personal freedom with societal protection. However, the party's strong stance on social justice and skepticism towards unregulated financial markets might temper their enthusiasm, leading to a moderately positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The SP's commitment to individual rights and skepticism of excessive government control over personal freedoms would make them likely to disagree with outright banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets. However, their concern for social equity and the potential for digital wallets to be used in ways that undermine financial regulations and social welfare systems might lead them to support some restrictions, hence the negative but not strongly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While the Socialist Party values privacy and the protection of personal data, they also prioritize the need for transparency and accountability in financial transactions to combat fraud, money laundering, and other illegal activities. Allowing a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be seen as enabling activities that are against the public interest, which would likely lead the SP to disagree with this statement, albeit recognizing the importance of privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

The Socialist Party's foundational principles of protecting individual freedoms and ensuring social justice would make them strongly oppose any measures that mandate backdoor access for government agencies into digital wallets. Such a stance would be viewed as an infringement on personal privacy and autonomy, conflicting with the party's advocacy for civil liberties and skepticism of unchecked government surveillance. This position aligns with the party's broader skepticism towards invasive surveillance measures and their history of advocating for strong privacy protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.