62% Yes |
38% No |
38% Yes |
38% No |
24% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
See how support for each position on “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 940 Netherlands voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Animal Testing” has changed over time for 940 Netherlands voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Netherlands users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@94HPH3M2yrs2Y
Yes but only if we also use humans to test. Life should be treated equal. You either do all or none.
@8ZP6Z8V2yrs2Y
Only if we can't find another solution (never for cosmetics btw). Yet, I still find it difficult.
@8WGP3KW3yrs3Y
No, give people the right to sign up for maybe an incentive, Since the products tested are for humans
@8V4SN8G3yrs3Y
Yes, but not for cosmetics and only to prevent greater suffering than sacrificed for the respective experiment.
@8RP6WHR3yrs3Y
Ja, maar geen cosmetica en geen primaten of iets dergelijks
@8RL26RB3yrs3Y
Yes, while developing alternate testing methods and not for cosmetics
Explore other topics that are important to Netherlands voters.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…