+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 307 Environmentalism voters.

44%
Yes
56%
No
40%
Yes
43%
No
3%
Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls
13%
No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities
2%
Yes, and abolish the police

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 307 Environmentalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 307 Environmentalism voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Environmentalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9NX2Z6Yanswered…6mos6MO

There should be a balance between the funds towards the police and the funds towards the social community programs which could benefit more in certain areas

 @9H4FWLXfrom California  answered…1yr1Y

Police funding should be have funds redirected into ways to help and sevice the community such as adding licensef therapist to the department and focus on mental health training and descalization

 @9DVW99Qfrom Tennessee  answered…1yr1Y

No, instead of lowering funding for police departments, invest additional funds in these social programs.

 @96C7CTLanswered…2yrs2Y

 @9698M3Ganswered…2yrs2Y

No, funding should either be the same or increased to help the police with mental health and integration with society. Of course, there should also be more spent of social and community based programs at the same time

 @8ZNHYR7answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but just a part of it if there is more need of that than the police.

 @8RN2V7Janswered…4yrs4Y

I think that the police is important and we shouldnt abolish it but funding towards to community would be more productive

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Defunding the Police” news articles, updated frequently.