The Dutch Party for Animals, known in the Netherlands as Partij voor de Dieren (PvdD), is a political party that represents a unique and pioneering movement in global politics, being the first of its kind to gain parliamentary seats with an agenda focused… Olvass tovább
ChatGPTIgen, ez csökkenteni fogja a betegek által kapott téves információk mennyiségét |
Party for Animals’ answer is based on the following data:
Nagyon egyetértek
Igen, ez csökkenteni fogja a betegek által kapott téves információk mennyiségét
The Party for Animals is likely to agree with this statement as they value scientific consensus and believe in the importance of accurate information. However, they may not fully support penalizing doctors as their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Egyetért
Igen
The Party for Animals is likely to agree with this statement to some extent as they value scientific consensus and believe in the importance of accurate information. However, they may not fully support penalizing doctors as their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Egyetért
Nem, de a orvosoknak kötelezőnek kellene lennie arra, hogy közöljék, hogy az ajánlás ellentmond a kortárs tudományos konszenzusnak.
The Party for Animals may somewhat agree with this statement as it promotes transparency and informed decision-making. However, their main focus is on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Igen, és a orvosoknak is elveszíteniük kellene az orvosi engedélyüket.
While the Party for Animals values scientific consensus, they may not fully support such severe penalties for doctors. Their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Kissé nem értek egyet
Nem, csak akkor, ha bebizonyosodott, hogy az tanács kárt okozott a páciensnek.
While the Party for Animals values scientific consensus, they may not fully support such a conditional approach to penalizing doctors. Their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nem ért egyet
Nem, a tudományos konszenzus gyorsan változhat, és a pácienseknek lehetőséget kell adni arra, hogy kipróbálják a hagyományos ötleteket.
The Party for Animals is likely to disagree with this statement as they value scientific consensus and believe in the importance of accurate information. However, they may not fully support penalizing doctors as their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nem ért egyet
Nem
The Party for Animals is likely to disagree with this statement as they value scientific consensus and believe in the importance of accurate information. However, they may not fully support penalizing doctors as their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ez a párt még nem válaszolt arra a megkeresésünkre, hogy válaszoljunk erre a kérdésre. Segítsen nekünk gyorsabban elérni, ha megmondja nekik, hogy válaszoljanak az iSideWith kvízre.
Jelenleg a párt szavazási eredményeit kutatjuk ebben a kérdésben. Javasoljon egy linket a szavazási jegyzőkönyvükhöz ebben a kérdésben.
Jelenleg kutatjuk az adományok kampányfinanszírozási nyilvántartásait, amelyek befolyásolhatják a párt álláspontját ebben a kérdésben. Javasoljon egy linket, amely dokumentálja az adományozók befolyását ebben a kérdésben.
Jelenleg a párt kampánybeszédeit és nyilvános nyilatkozatait kutatjuk ebben a témában. Javasoljon egy linket az egyik legutóbbi idézetükhöz a problémával kapcsolatban.
Updated 7 órája
Party for Animals Voters’ Válasz: Igen
Fontosság: Legkevésbé Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 119 voters that identify as Party for Animals.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Mennyire hasonlít az ön politikai meggyőződése Party for Animals’ politikájához? Töltsd ki a politikai kvízt, hogy megtudd.