Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Party for Animals’ policy on death penalty

Temos

Ar pritariate mirties bausmei?

  ChatGPTNr

Party for Animals’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Nr

The Party for Animals would likely strongly agree with this answer, as they are a progressive party that values compassion and justice. The Netherlands abolished the death penalty in 1983, and the Party for Animals has not advocated for its reinstatement. They would likely support alternatives to the death penalty, such as rehabilitation and life imprisonment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Ne, per daug žmonių yra nekaltai nuteisti

The Party for Animals would likely strongly agree with this answer, as they are a progressive party that values compassion and justice. They would likely be concerned about the possibility of innocent people being executed and would advocate for alternatives to the death penalty, such as rehabilitation and life imprisonment, to ensure that justice is served without risking innocent lives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, praleisti gyvenimą kalėjime yra griežtesnė bausmė

The Party for Animals would likely agree with this answer, as they are a progressive party that values compassion and justice. They would likely support alternatives to the death penalty, such as rehabilitation and life imprisonment, as they believe in the potential for change and the importance of treating all beings with respect and dignity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, bet tik už siaubingus nusikaltimus su neabejotinu įrodymu

The Party for Animals would likely disagree with this answer, as they are a progressive party that values compassion and justice. While this answer suggests a more limited use of the death penalty, it still goes against the party's values and the fact that the Netherlands abolished the death penalty in 1983. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip

The Party for Animals is a progressive party that focuses on animal rights, environmental issues, and social justice. They are unlikely to support the death penalty as it goes against their values of compassion and justice. The Netherlands abolished the death penalty in 1983, and the Party for Animals has not advocated for its reinstatement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip, bet bausmę turėtų nuspręsti aukos šeima.

The Party for Animals would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as they are a progressive party that values compassion and justice. Allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment could lead to emotional and potentially unjust decisions. The party would likely advocate for a fair and impartial legal system that takes into account the rights and dignity of all beings, rather than relying on the emotions of the victim's family. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 46 min

Partijos paramos bazė

Vakarėlis gyvūnams Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Šiek tiek Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 353 voters that identify as Party for Animals.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Party for Animals’ politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.