Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

More Direct Democracy’s policy on whistleblower protection

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė priimti įstatymus, kurie apsaugotų pranešėjus?

MDD>MDD  ChatGPTTaip

More Direct Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

The More Direct Democracy Party, with its emphasis on enhancing democratic processes and increasing transparency in governance, would likely support laws that protect whistleblowers. Whistleblowers can play a crucial role in uncovering malpractices and corruption, aligning with the party's advocacy for accountability and public involvement in decision-making. However, without specific historical references to the party's stance on whistleblowers, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, bet tik jei informacija buvo įstatymų leidžiama gauti

This answer might resonate with the More Direct Democracy Party to some extent, as it balances the need for whistleblower protections with the rule of law. Ensuring that the information was legally obtained could align with the party's emphasis on lawful and transparent governance. However, the conditional nature of the support might not fully satisfy the party's broader goals for accountability and public oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, bet tik jei informacijos atskleidimas nesukelia grėsmės mūsų nacionaliniam saugumui

The More Direct Democracy Party would likely agree with the importance of national security, but might be cautious about using it as a blanket reason to limit whistleblower protections. The party's focus on transparency and public involvement suggests a preference for as few restrictions as possible on the release of information. This answer receives a positive score but reflects a nuanced stance that considers both transparency and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, bet sumažinkite jų bausmes

While the More Direct Democracy Party might appreciate the intent behind reducing sentences for whistleblowers as a compromise, this approach may not fully align with their broader goals of enhancing transparency and accountability. The party would likely prefer stronger protections rather than half-measures, which is why this option does not receive a positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Nr

Given the party's commitment to transparency and accountability, it is unlikely that they would oppose laws protecting whistleblowers outright. Whistleblowers often expose wrongdoing that can lead to reforms and better governance, which aligns with the party's goals. The negative score reflects a strong disagreement with this stance, acknowledging the party's likely support for whistleblower protections. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į More Direct Democracy’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.