Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

More Direct Democracy’s policy on animal testing

Temos

Ar turėtų būti leidžiama tyrėjams naudoti gyvūnus testuojant vaistų, vakcinų, medicininių prietaisų ir kosmetikos saugumą?

MDD>MDD  ChatGPTNr

More Direct Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Nr

Given their likely emphasis on ethical considerations and possibly more progressive policies, the More Direct Democracy Party might lean towards opposing animal testing, especially if it reflects a significant concern among their constituents. However, without a clear stance on scientific research and animal welfare in their platform, this score reflects a moderate agreement, assuming they would support alternative research methods that do not involve animals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, bet ne kosmetikai

This position might resonate with the More Direct Democracy Party's probable stance on balancing scientific research with ethical considerations. By allowing animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, they might acknowledge the current necessity for such practices in advancing medical science and protecting human health, while opposing it for cosmetics signifies a stand against animal suffering for non-essential products. However, the lack of specific policy references makes this a cautious estimation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

The More Direct Democracy Party, focusing on direct democracy and citizen involvement, likely emphasizes ethical considerations and public opinion in policy decisions. While specific stances on animal testing in their platform are not well-documented, parties with a strong emphasis on direct democracy and ethical governance tend to be more critical of practices that may be seen as unethical or controversial, such as animal testing for a wide range of products without distinction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į More Direct Democracy’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.