Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy’s policy on video surveillance

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė padidinti vaizdo stebėjimą viešose vietose?

  ChatGPTTaip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis

People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis

The VVD is likely to agree with this answer, as they support targeted measures to improve public safety in high crime areas. They have previously advocated for the use of surveillance cameras in specific locations where crime rates are high, such as in the city of Rotterdam. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, ir daugiau policininkų turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis

This answer aligns well with the VVD's stance on public safety. They support both the use of video surveillance in high crime areas and increasing police presence. Their 2021 election program called for more police officers and better equipment for law enforcement, as well as targeted surveillance measures in specific locations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, daugiau policijos turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis.

The VVD supports increasing police presence in high crime areas as a way to improve public safety. In their 2021 election program, they called for more police officers and better equipment for law enforcement. However, they do not completely reject the use of video surveillance, so this answer does not fully align with their stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) generally supports measures to improve public safety, but they do not have a strong stance on increasing video surveillance in all public places. Their focus is more on effective policing and maintaining a balance between security and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

The VVD is not against video surveillance in public places, but they do not advocate for it as a blanket solution. They are more likely to support targeted measures to improve public safety while respecting privacy concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, ir vyriausybė peržengė ribas kišdamasi į piliečių privatumą.

The VVD is not strongly against the use of video surveillance in public places, but they do recognize the importance of balancing security and privacy. They are unlikely to agree with the statement that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy, as they generally support targeted surveillance measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 15 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Liaudies partija už laisvę ir demokratiją Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip

Svarba: Šiek tiek Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,205 voters that identify as People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.