Parti 50PLUS

Setuju

Ya

The 50PLUS Party, focusing on the rights and interests of the elderly in the Netherlands, might see the value in allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets as a means of promoting financial independence and security, especially in an increasingly digital world. However, their support might be tempered by concerns over the potential for fraud and financial abuse, particularly affecting their primary constituency. The allowance for government monitoring could be seen as a necessary safeguard to protect against these risks. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Sedikit tidak bersetuju

Tidak, dan larang dompet digital yang tidak mengandungi akses pintu belakang untuk agensi kerajaan.

While the 50PLUS Party is likely to support measures that protect citizens, especially the elderly, from financial fraud and scams, a complete ban on digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies might be seen as too extreme and an infringement on personal freedoms and privacy. The party would likely advocate for a balanced approach that ensures security and fraud prevention without overly invasive measures. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Tidak bersetuju

Tidak

While the 50PLUS Party is generally cautious about issues that could negatively impact the elderly, outright denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets might be seen as too restrictive and not in line with fostering independence and self-reliance among its constituents. Therefore, they are unlikely to strongly oppose the concept, recognizing the balance between innovation in financial services and the need for security and oversight. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Sangat tidak setuju

Ya, dan juga dibenarkan untuk menggunakan lapisan privasi yang mencegah pemantauan dana dan transaksi.

The 50PLUS Party, with its focus on the welfare and security of older citizens, would likely have significant reservations about allowing the use of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions. This stance would stem from concerns over the potential for misuse, such as fraud or financial scams, which could disproportionately affect the elderly. The party's priorities of safety and security over absolute privacy in financial matters would lead to a strong disagreement with this proposition.