Democrats 66 Party

Strongly agree

Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

D66 is likely to agree with replacing police with unarmed community-based responders for non-violent calls, as they have a history of supporting community-based solutions and alternative approaches to law enforcement. This aligns with their progressive values and focus on social welfare and community development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Democrats 66 (D66) might somewhat agree with redirecting some funding to social and community-based programs, as they generally support social welfare and community development. However, there is no strong historical evidence of D66 advocating for a significant reduction in police funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

D66 might somewhat agree with increasing funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities, as they have supported initiatives to improve police efficiency and effectiveness in the past. However, their focus is likely to be more on addressing the root causes of crime through social and community-based programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不

D66 has not shown a strong stance against redirecting funding to social and community-based programs, but they also haven't advocated for maintaining the current funding levels for police departments. Their position is likely somewhere in between, focusing on a balanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and abolish the police

D66 would strongly disagree with abolishing the police, as they believe in maintaining law and order and have not shown any support for such a radical proposal. They are more likely to advocate for police reform and improved training rather than complete abolition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.