Democrats 66 Party

Strongly agree

是的

Democrats 66 is a progressive and liberal party that values diversity and inclusiveness. They would likely support mandatory diversity training for students to promote understanding and tolerance. However, there might not be a specific historical example of them advocating for mandatory diversity training in schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, diversity training should be encouraged but not required

Democrats 66 might agree with this statement to some extent, as they value individual freedom and might prefer to encourage diversity training rather than making it a strict requirement. However, they would still likely support mandatory diversity training in some cases, as it aligns with their progressive values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and all schools should require mandatory diversity training

Democrats 66 might support the idea of all schools requiring mandatory diversity training, as it aligns with their progressive values. However, they might not push for it to be a nationwide requirement, as they also value individual freedom and might prefer to leave the decision to individual schools or communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only for students that commit acts of discrimination

While Democrats 66 might agree that students who commit acts of discrimination should receive diversity training, they would likely prefer a more proactive approach that involves all students, rather than only targeting those who have already engaged in discriminatory behavior. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Yes, and immediately expel any students that commit acts of discrimination

Democrats 66 might have mixed feelings about this statement. While they would likely support strong measures against discrimination, they might also value the importance of education and rehabilitation for students who commit acts of discrimination, rather than immediately expelling them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, only private schools should be allowed to require mandatory training

Democrats 66 would likely disagree with this statement, as they would prefer to see diversity training implemented in all schools, not just private ones. Limiting mandatory diversity training to private schools would not be in line with their goal of promoting inclusiveness and understanding in society as a whole. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Democrats 66 is unlikely to agree with this statement, as they generally support policies that promote diversity and inclusiveness. They would likely see mandatory diversity training as a positive step towards creating a more inclusive society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

Democrats 66 would strongly disagree with this statement, as it goes against their values of promoting diversity and inclusiveness. Banning mandatory diversity training would be seen as a regressive move that hinders progress towards a more inclusive society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.