Democrats 66 Party

同意

是的

Democrats 66 (D66) generally supports innovation and the digital economy, advocating for policies that embrace technological advancements while ensuring they serve the public interest. Their stance on digital privacy and government surveillance is nuanced, balancing the need for security with individual freedoms. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets with government monitoring aligns with their approach to regulate new technologies in a way that protects citizens' rights while maintaining oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While D66 champions digital privacy and the protection of personal data, they also recognize the government's role in ensuring national security and preventing financial crimes. The party's support for a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions might be tempered by concerns over money laundering, tax evasion, and financing of terrorism. Therefore, they might support this with reservations, advocating for a balanced approach that also includes measures to combat illegal activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

D66's platform typically emphasizes the importance of digital freedom and innovation, suggesting a likely opposition to outright bans on technology that can empower citizens, such as self-hosted digital wallets. Their policies often reflect a desire to integrate digital advancements into society responsibly, rather than rejecting them, making a complete prohibition inconsistent with their general stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

D66 has historically opposed measures that infringe on digital privacy and individual freedoms, such as mandatory backdoors in encryption technology. They are likely to view a ban on digital wallets without government backdoor access as an overreach that compromises privacy and security. Their advocacy for strong encryption and opposition to laws that weaken digital security measures suggest a strong disagreement with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.