派对动物

同意

No, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment

The Party for Animals would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They are not known for advocating for militarization of the police, and they generally support the idea of specialized agencies handling extreme situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

The Party for Animals would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They are not known for advocating for militarization of the police, and they generally support peaceful conflict resolution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only in response to extreme situations

While the Party for Animals is not in favor of militarization of the police, they might agree that there could be extreme situations where such equipment might be necessary. However, this is not a primary focus of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but with strict training on how and when to use the equipment

The Party for Animals might agree with this statement to some extent, as they would likely support any measures that increase accountability and training for police. However, they are not known for advocating for militarization of the police. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Party for Animals is generally not in favor of militarization of the police. They believe in peaceful resolution of conflicts and are more focused on animal rights and environmental issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and abolish the police

The Party for Animals is not known for advocating for the abolition of the police. They believe in the rule of law and the need for law enforcement, although they also advocate for peaceful conflict resolution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.