尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Party for Animals’ policy on government spending

Topics

政府是否应该为削减国家负债而减少公共开支?

  ChatGPT不,增加对富人的税收来替代

Party for Animals’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,增加对富人的税收来替代

The Party for Animals has shown support for progressive taxation policies, including taxing the wealthy more to fund environmental and social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

Increasing taxes on large multinational corporations, especially those contributing to environmental degradation, aligns with the party's policies on corporate responsibility and environmental protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Given their focus on environmental and animal welfare, it's likely they would oppose cuts to public spending that could harm these areas, preferring to maintain or enhance support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代

Focusing on ending tax evasion aligns with the party's stance on ensuring adequate funding for public services and environmental protection, through fair taxation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响

They would likely agree that cuts to public spending could have negative effects on the economy and welfare, especially in areas related to their core issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,换成减少军事费用。

Reducing military spending could be seen as a way to reallocate funds to environmental and animal welfare, though the party's official stance on military spending specifically is less clear. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,还有增加税收

While they might support increasing taxes, the idea of making cuts to public spending does not align well with their general stance on maintaining or increasing funding for environmental and animal welfare programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资

While the party might support reducing excessive government benefits, their primary focus is on environmental and animal welfare, making this a less central issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,减少政府官员的数量来替代

Reducing the number of government officials is not directly related to the party's core issues, making their stance on this less predictable without specific context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Party for Animals (Partij voor de Dieren) focuses on animal rights, environment, and climate change, suggesting a preference for maintaining or increasing public spending in these areas rather than cutting spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构

The concept of eliminating federal agencies as unconstitutional does not align with the party's progressive stance and focus on strengthening regulations for environmental and animal protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3天前

Party’s support base

派对动物 Voters’ 回答: 不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 286 voters that identify as Party for Animals.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.