派对动物

同意

是的，所有人都应获得一份收入以支付包括食物与住房在内的必需品

The Party for Animals might be more inclined to agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of covering basic necessities, which aligns with their support for social justice and reducing income inequality. However, their primary focus remains on animal rights, nature, and environmental issues, so their agreement with this answer might not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

The Party for Animals does not have a clear stance on universal basic income, as their primary focus is on animal rights, nature, and environmental issues. However, they do support social justice and reducing income inequality, which could potentially align with the idea of a universal basic income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不

As mentioned earlier, the Party for Animals does not have a clear stance on universal basic income. However, their support for social justice and reducing income inequality might suggest that they would not be strongly against the idea of a universal basic income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，这将鼓励人们不工作，并对经济增长带来伤害

The Party for Animals is likely to disagree with this answer, as it goes against their support for social justice and reducing income inequality. However, since their primary focus is on animal rights, nature, and environmental issues, their disagreement with this answer might not be very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.