The Dutch Party for Animals, known in the Netherlands as Partij voor de Dieren (PvdD), is a political party that represents a unique and pioneering movement in global politics, being the first of its kind to gain parliamentary seats with an agenda focused… Read more
ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
Party for Animals’ answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务
The Party for Animals would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their general stance on personal freedom and choice. They have not advocated for mandatory military service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
不
The Party for Animals would likely agree with this statement as they have not advocated for mandatory military service. Their focus is more on animal rights, nature, and environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。
While the Party for Animals might agree with the focus on education and skill development, they would likely disagree with the mandatory aspect of this statement. Their focus is more on animal rights, nature, and environment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的
The Party for Animals is primarily focused on animal rights, nature, and environment. They have not shown support for mandatory military service, as it does not align with their main political goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年
The Party for Animals would likely disagree with this statement as it implies a longer period of mandatory military service. This does not align with their main political goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人
The Party for Animals would likely disagree with this statement as it implies mandatory military service for certain individuals. This does not align with their main political goals.
Very strongly disagree
是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。
The Party for Animals would likely disagree with this statement as it implies mandatory military service for certain individuals. This does not align with their main political goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.