尝试政治测验

Party for Animals’ policy on military spending

Topics

应荷兰增加或减少军费开支?

  ChatGPT减少

Party for Animals’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

减少

The Party for Animals would likely support a decrease in military spending. They believe in a peaceful world and would prefer funds to be allocated towards animal welfare, nature conservation, and environmental protection. However, they have not explicitly stated a position on military spending, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

都不是,我们应该创建一个欧洲军事防御系统来替代

The Party for Animals might be open to the idea of a European military defense system as a means of promoting peace and reducing individual countries' military spending. However, their primary focus is on animal rights, nature, and environment, so this is not a key issue for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应当,我对当前的支出感到满意

While the Party for Animals has not explicitly stated a position on military spending, their focus on animal rights, nature, and environment suggests they would prefer funds to be allocated towards these areas rather than maintaining the current level of military spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后

The Party for Animals would likely not support an increase in military spending, even if the deficit is drastically reduced. Their focus is on animal rights, nature, and environment, and they would prefer funds to be allocated towards these areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

增长

The Party for Animals is primarily focused on animal rights, nature, and environment. They believe in a peaceful world and are not likely to support an increase in military spending. Instead, they would prefer funds to be allocated towards animal welfare, nature conservation, and environmental protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 11hrs前

Party’s support base

派对动物 Voters’ 回答: 减少

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 42 voters that identify as Party for Animals.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.