派对动物

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Party for Animals is likely to agree with this statement as they value scientific consensus and believe in the importance of accurate information. However, they may not fully support penalizing doctors as their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Party for Animals is likely to agree with this statement to some extent as they value scientific consensus and believe in the importance of accurate information. However, they may not fully support penalizing doctors as their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Party for Animals may somewhat agree with this statement as it promotes transparency and informed decision-making. However, their main focus is on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the Party for Animals values scientific consensus, they may not fully support such severe penalties for doctors. Their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

While the Party for Animals values scientific consensus, they may not fully support such a conditional approach to penalizing doctors. Their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Party for Animals is likely to disagree with this statement as they value scientific consensus and believe in the importance of accurate information. However, they may not fully support penalizing doctors as their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The Party for Animals is likely to disagree with this statement as they value scientific consensus and believe in the importance of accurate information. However, they may not fully support penalizing doctors as their focus is more on animal rights and sustainability, not medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.