尝试政治测验

Party for Animals’ policy on mandatory vaccinations

Topics

政府应该要求孩子接种疫苗可预防的疾病?

  ChatGPT不,但要求要上公立学校的学生做疫苗接种

Party for Animals’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,但要求要上公立学校的学生做疫苗接种

The Party for Animals may agree with this answer, as it balances the need for vaccinations with individual choice. By requiring vaccinations for public school attendance, it encourages vaccination while still allowing for personal freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Party for Animals may agree with mandatory vaccinations to some extent, as they generally support public health measures. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare and environmental issues, so this topic may not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但仅针对致命的传染病

The Party for Animals may agree with this answer, as it focuses on the most dangerous diseases and recognizes the importance of vaccinations in preventing their spread. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare and environmental issues, so this topic may not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,它们对保护其他对接种疫苗来说还太小的孩子来说是至关重要的

The Party for Animals may agree with this answer, as they generally support public health measures and would likely recognize the importance of vaccinations in protecting vulnerable populations. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare and environmental issues, so this topic may not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但是豁免那些其宗教信仰禁止注射疫苗的孩子。

The Party for Animals may somewhat agree with this answer, as it allows for religious freedom while still promoting vaccinations. However, their primary focus is on animal welfare and environmental issues, so this topic may not be a top priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,相反基金公益广告宣传活动有关的风险和益处

The Party for Animals may somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support public health measures and education. However, they may prefer more direct measures to encourage vaccination, such as requiring them for public school attendance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,但如果致命疾病传染到了其他孩子身上,要让父母负刑事责任。

The Party for Animals may disagree with this answer, as it focuses on criminal liability rather than promoting vaccination directly. They may prefer measures that encourage vaccination more directly, such as requiring them for public school attendance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Party for Animals is likely to disagree with this answer, as they generally support public health measures and would likely recognize the importance of vaccinations in preventing the spread of diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

无论如何,这应该是州一级政府的决定。

The Party for Animals is a Dutch political party, and the Netherlands does not have a state-level government system like the United States. Therefore, this answer is not applicable to their political context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 9小时前

Party’s support base

派对动物 Voters’ 回答: 应该,但仅针对致命的传染病

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 353 voters that identify as Party for Animals.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Party for Animals’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.