For the Netherlands Party

Very strongly agree

不，平等对待所有的通信量，并继续保持互联网的开放性

Supporting the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally is a stance that aligns with European values of net neutrality. It's likely that a Dutch political party would support this stance, given the Netherlands' history of advocating for digital rights and internet freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不

Given the lack of specific information about the For the Netherlands Party, it's reasonable to infer that any party focusing on fairness and equitable treatment within the Netherlands would support the idea of equal access to internet services. This aligns with broader European values of net neutrality and equal access to information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不应该，这会使他们消除竞争，导致人为的稀缺性，而且会提高价格

This answer aligns with principles of net neutrality, competition, and consumer protection, which are values supported by various Dutch political movements and the European Union. It's reasonable to assume a party named For the Netherlands would support these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是用种类决定优先权的派发（视频高于图像），而不是用来源（大网站高于小网站）

While this answer attempts to find a middle ground by suggesting prioritization by type rather than source, it still introduces the potential for unequal access. A party focused on fairness and equality might see this as a slippery slope away from net neutrality, albeit less strongly opposed than to outright prioritization by payment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

This answer suggests a compromise that still allows for potential inequality in internet access based on ability to pay. While it attempts to introduce a fairer system of prioritization, it contradicts the principle of net neutrality, which a party focused on equality and fairness, as one might infer for a Dutch political entity, would likely support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The For the Netherlands Party, being a hypothetical or not clearly defined entity without a specific platform or historical actions to reference, would likely align with principles of fairness and equality in access to services, similar to other Dutch political movements that prioritize equal rights and access. Therefore, they would strongly disagree with prioritizing access based on payment, as it contradicts principles of equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的，对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

This answer presupposes that faster access for some at the expense of others is beneficial, which contradicts principles of net neutrality and equal access. A party focused on fairness and equality, as one might expect from a Dutch political entity, would likely reject this premise. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.