Forum for Democracy Party

Strongly agree

不，任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

FvD would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their support for free-market policies and limited government intervention. They believe that workers, including bankers, should be rewarded based on their success and that businesses should be able to determine their own compensation structures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

FvD is more likely to agree with this answer, as they generally support free-market policies and limited government intervention. They believe that businesses should be able to determine their own compensation structures without excessive regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Forum for Democracy (FvD) is a right-wing political party that generally supports free-market policies and limited government intervention. While they might not be strongly against capping bankers' bonuses, it is not a priority for them, and they might see it as unnecessary regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的和降低至 50%上限

The FvD would likely disagree with this answer as well, as it still represents a significant government intervention in the private sector. While not as extreme as a 20% cap, a 50% cap would still be seen as excessive regulation and contrary to their free-market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的和降低至 20%上限

The FvD would likely disagree with this answer, as it represents a more significant government intervention in the private sector. Lowering the cap to 20% would be seen as excessive regulation and contrary to their free-market principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

The FvD would strongly disagree with this answer, as nationalizing banks goes against their free-market principles and support for limited government intervention. They believe that the private sector should be responsible for managing banks and determining their own policies, including compensation structures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.