尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Forum for Democracy policy on government pensions

Topics

是不应该增加退休政府工作人员的养老金支付?

  ChatGPT在我们削减国债之前,不应该

Forum for Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

在我们削减国债之前,不应该

The FvD has a strong focus on fiscal responsibility and reducing national debt. Therefore, they would likely agree with the idea of not increasing pension payments until the national debt is decreased. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者

The FvD might agree with this statement as it aligns with their focus on fiscal responsibility and their belief in a safety net for those in need. However, they have not explicitly advocated for this policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

While the FvD has not explicitly advocated for a decrease in pension payments, their general stance on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending suggests they would not be in favor of a blanket increase. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

While the FvD has not explicitly advocated for yearly adjustments to pension payments for cost of living, this could align with their focus on fiscal responsibility and ensuring a safety net for those in need. However, without specific policy proposals, it is difficult to determine their stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客

The FvD has not made any specific statements about differentiating pension payments between government workers and politicians. Therefore, it is unclear how they would feel about this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

While the FvD is focused on fiscal responsibility, they have not explicitly advocated for reducing pension payments for retired government workers. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement, but not strongly.

不同意

是的

The Forum for Democracy (FvD) has not explicitly advocated for an increase in pension payments for all retired government workers. They are more focused on fiscal responsibility and reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Forum for Democracy policies? Take the political quiz to find out.