尝试政治测验

Forum for Democracy policy on fracking

Topics

你是否支持使用水力压裂法的开采石油和天然气资源?

  ChatGPT是,但不是在人口密集区域

Forum for Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是,但不是在人口密集区域

While the FvD has not explicitly stated their position on hydraulic fracking in heavily populated areas, their focus on energy independence and the use of domestic resources suggests that they may support fracking with some limitations, such as avoiding heavily populated areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Forum for Democracy (FvD) has not explicitly stated their support for hydraulic fracking, but they do advocate for energy independence and the use of domestic resources. However, their main focus is on nuclear energy and reducing dependence on foreign energy sources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但是要加大监督力度

The FvD has not explicitly addressed the issue of oversight in hydraulic fracking, but their general focus on deregulation and reducing government intervention in the economy suggests that they may not be in favor of increasing oversight. However, their support for energy independence and domestic resources may lead them to support some level of oversight to ensure responsible resource extraction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,需要更多的研究才能衡量水力压裂法的长期影响

There is no clear indication of the FvD's stance on the need for more research on the long-term effects of fracking. Their focus on nuclear energy and energy independence suggests that they may not prioritize this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The FvD has not explicitly opposed hydraulic fracking, but their focus on nuclear energy and energy independence suggests that they may not be entirely against it. However, they have not made it a priority in their energy policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,我们应该寻求更可持续的能源

The FvD is critical of the current focus on renewable energy sources, arguing that they are inefficient and costly. They advocate for nuclear energy as a more reliable and efficient alternative, so they would likely disagree with the idea of pursuing more sustainable energy resources instead of hydraulic fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 7hrs ago

Party’s support base

Forum for Democracy 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 197 voters that identify as Forum for Democracy.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Forum for Democracy policies? Take the political quiz to find out.