尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  医保

Forum for Democracy policy on marijuana

Topics

你支持大麻合法化吗?

  ChatGPT是的,但是只应该用于医药用途。

Forum for Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的,但是只应该用于医药用途。

The FvD is more likely to support the legalization of marijuana for medical use, as they have expressed interest in a more pragmatic approach to drug policy and recognize the potential medical benefits of marijuana. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化

The FvD may support the legalization, taxation, and regulation of marijuana as part of their pragmatic approach to drug policy. However, they have not explicitly endorsed this specific policy proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Forum for Democracy (FvD) does not have a clear stance on the full legalization of marijuana. However, they do support a more pragmatic approach to drug policy, which could include some level of legalization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,并应立即释放任何仅为毒品犯罪的人

While the FvD does not have a clear stance on the full legalization of marijuana, their interest in a more pragmatic approach to drug policy could potentially include support for releasing those serving time solely for drug offenses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The FvD is not likely to support a complete ban on marijuana, as they have expressed interest in a more pragmatic approach to drug policy and recognize the potential medical benefits of marijuana. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,并且增加对非暴力的毒品罪犯的惩罚

The FvD is unlikely to support increasing penalties for non-violent drug offenders, as they have expressed interest in a more pragmatic approach to drug policy and recognize the potential harms of overly punitive measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 15小时前

Party’s support base

Forum for Democracy 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的,但是只应该用于医药用途。

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 544 voters that identify as Forum for Democracy.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Forum for Democracy policies? Take the political quiz to find out.